GST Update: Weekly Goods and Service Tax latest News – December 2025

GST WEEKLY UPDATE : 38/2025-26 (22.12.2025)

1. GSTN Update On Flexible Credit Note Handling In IMS:

The GST Network (GSTN) has introduced a significant and much-awaited enhancement in the Invoice Management System (IMS) on the GST portal, aimed at resolving long-standing practical difficulties faced by taxpayers in handling credit notes, especially in cases involving ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC).

Earlier, acceptance of a credit note in IMS automatically resulted in reversal of ITC, irrespective of whether the ITC was already reversed, never availed, or was otherwise ineligible. This rigid system often caused double reversal of ITC, mismatches between books and returns, and avoidable reconciliation disputes.

To address this issue, GSTN has now introduced a flexible option while accepting credit notes, allowing taxpayers to determine whether ITC reduction is actually required.

Key Change Introduced by GSTN

While accepting a credit note in IMS, taxpayers will now be prompted to select:

• “Yes” – ITC to be reduced (default option), or
• “No” – ITC not to be reduced

How It Works

• Yes → ITC will be reduced in the electronic credit ledger
• No → ITC will remain unchanged

This flexibility ensures that ITC is adjusted only where required, reflecting the true tax position.

Practical Importance of the Update

This enhancement is particularly beneficial in the following scenarios:

• ITC was already reversed in earlier returns
• ITC was never availed due to ineligibility (e.g., blocked credit under Section 17(5))
• Credit note pertains to post-supply price revisions where tax impact was already neutralised
• Accounting corrections without GST credit implication

Earlier, taxpayers had no choice but to accept credit notes with automatic ITC reversal, leading to double disallowance and subsequent litigation or rectification efforts.

Important Clarification on Bulk Acceptance

GSTN has clarified that:

• Where multiple credit notes are accepted together using the checkbox option, the selected response (Yes/No) will apply uniformly to all selected records
• If different treatment is required for different credit notes, they must be processed individually

Read Also: GST Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF): Features, Updates & Filing Guide

This calls for careful review before bulk acceptance.

Illustration

Scenario:

• A taxpayer received a credit note of ₹1,00,000 + GST ₹18,000
• The ITC of ₹18,000 had already been reversed earlier during audit reconciliation

Earlier System:

• Acceptance of credit note → automatic ITC reduction
• Result: Double reversal of ₹18,000

Under the New IMS Functionality:

• Taxpayer selects “No – ITC not to be reduced”
• ITC remains unchanged
• Correct tax position maintained

FAQs – Client Advisory

Q1. Is this option mandatory to select?

Yes. While accepting a credit note in IMS, the system now requires the taxpayer to confirm whether ITC reduction is required.

Q2. What happens if no selection is made?

The system defaults to “Yes – ITC to be reduced”. Hence, caution is advised.

Q3. Can this option be changed after acceptance?

As per current functionality, once accepted, changes may not be easily reversible. Proper review before submission is critical.

Q4. Does this apply to all credit notes?

Yes, the option applies to credit notes reflected in IMS, including cases of ineligible ITC.

Q5. Is this applicable retrospectively?

The update applies to credit notes processed after implementation. Past reversals will need manual reconciliation or rectification, if permissible.

Read Also: New GST Mandates from April 2025: MFA, E-Invoicing & More

2. Consolidated FAQ GSTR-9 & 9C:

Q. No.	Issue / Query	Short Answer / Key Point
1	When GSTR-9/9C enabled?	After filing all GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B of FY 24-25
2	If any return pending?	GSTR-9 not enabled
3	What is Table 8A?	ITC as per GSTR-2B of FY 24-25 (incl. Apr–Oct next FY)
4	Impact of IMS on GSTR-9?	No direct impact; data flows via GSTR-2B
5	GSTR-1A effect on GSTR-9?	Yes, auto-population in Table 4 & 5
6	What is Table 6A1?	ITC of FY 23-24 claimed in FY 24-25 (except Rule 37/37A)
7	ITC claimed, reversed & reclaimed same FY	Claim → 6B, Reversal → Table 7, Reclaim → 6H
8	FY 23-24 ITC reclaimed in FY 24-25	Non-37/37A → 6A1; Rule 37/37A → 6H
9	FY 24-25 ITC reclaimed in FY 25-26	Depends on reason; reported in next year tables
10	Change in Table 6M?	No change; only label aligned
11	What is Table 8A Excel?	Invoice-wise details downloadable from portal
12	Difference between 8A Excel & UI?	Yes, in specific amendment/RCM/PoS cases
13	Supplier amendments impact?	Yes, amended data auto-populated
14	Invoices of FY 24-25 added next FY	Included in 8A after recipient files 3B
15	What is Table 8C?	Missed ITC of FY 24-25 claimed in next FY
16	ITC reclaimed next FY after reversal	Not to be reported in 8C
17	When 8C applicable?	Missed ITC or late-reported supplier invoices
18	Delinking 6H from 8B effect	Reduces mismatch in Table 8D
19	Import ITC claimed next FY	Report in 8H1 & Table 13
20	Tax payable in Table 9	Net liability from GSTR-3B
21	Change in Table 12 & 13 labels	No reporting impact
22	HSN reporting help	Excel download provided
23	65% concessional rate	Removed from GSTR-9
24	Late fee in GSTR-9C	As per Sec 47(2); auto-calculated
25	Rule 37/37A reclaimed ITC	Treated as ITC of reclaim year
26	RCM paid in next FY	Report in GSTR-9 of payment year
27	FY 23-24 ITC reversed in FY 24-25	No reporting in Table 7
28	Table 12B vs 7J mismatch	Explain difference in 9C Table 13
29	Table 7J ≠ GSTR-3B 4C	Due to prior-year ITC
30	FY 23-24 ITC reversed in FY 24-25	Not reported in GSTR-9
31	Goods received next FY	Accounting-based; explain in 9C
32	Non-GST purchases	Not required to report
33	Table 4G1 applicable to whom	Only e-commerce operators u/s 9(5)

3. AAR & Important Judgements:

(i) Calcutta Highcourt Decision Regarding IGST ITC claimed in GSTR-9 – Failure to claim in GSTR-3B – Appellate Authority bound to pass reasoned order – Mechanical rejection without examining offset against CGST/SGST demand unsustainable – Matter remanded for fresh adjudication:

(Applicant – Laxmi Ghosh)

Where the taxpayer inadvertently failed to claim eligible IGST Input Tax Credit in monthly returns in Form GSTR-3B but subsequently disclosed and claimed such ITC in the annual return in Form GSTR-9, the Appellate Authority cannot reject the claim merely by stating that the plea is “devoid of logic, facts and proper explanation” without assigning cogent reasons or specifying deficiencies in documents. Failure to examine whether IGST ITC disclosed in GSTR-9 could be adjusted against CGST/SGST demand renders the appellate order arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration with directions to pass a reasoned order.

Read Also: GSTN Postpones Non-Editable Table 3.2 in GSTR-3B After Taxpayers’ Grievances

Disclaimer: The article or blog or post (by whatever name) in this website is based on the writer’s personal views and interpretation of Act. The writer does not accept any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of information and for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Also, www.babatax.com and its members do not accept any liability, obligation or responsibility for author’s article and understanding of user.

For Collaborating with us-

• Mail us at [email protected]
• Whatsapp us at +91-7024984925